离婚协议

告别短板！杨奇揭秘《钟馗》新实机，修正前作遗留的诸多问题_我的网站

蒲松龄

一 |

Illustration: Liu Rui/GTA new report funded by Australia's Department of Defense played up security risks to submarine cables in the Indo-Pacific waters and pointed finger at China and some other countries over alleged undersea‑cable attacks in recent years, while claiming threats against subsea cables are growing. A Chinese expert said that accusing China without conclusive evidence constitutes "over‑securitization" made by Australian side, as well as a calculated pretext for its own military expansion.
Published by the National Security College at the Australian National University (ANU), the paper claimed recent damage to cables in the Baltic Sea and around China's Taiwan region suggests "state actors are now actively probing and testing cable infrastructure in peacetime as part of broader hybrid warfare strategies" to rapidly degrade connectivity at the outset of a conflict, The Australian reported.
The paper claimed 16 privately owned subsea cables that carry 99 percent of Australia's internet traffic are a "high priority target" for Australia's adversaries that could be severed in a conflict, threatening the nation's economy and social fabric, according to The Australian.
The report singled out China and Russia for blame, saying that there have been multiple apparent attacks on submarine cables in recent years in European waters as well as near China's Taiwan region, suspected to be linked to Russia and China, the Straits Times reported.
However, the report cites a 2025 voyage by Chinese research vessel Tan Suo Yi Hao along Australia's western and southern coastlines as evidence to back its claim that "potential adversaries are actively gathering information about Australia's cable infrastructure."
This report, relying on the routine scientific operations of a Chinese research vessel in 2025 to level allegations of offensive actions against China, and employing ambiguous terminology such as "suspected" and "potential," demonstrates Australia's evidentiary leap, Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday.
This erroneous claim was refuted by the Chinese Foreign Ministry at the time. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on March 31, 2025 that China carries out normal activities at sea in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS.
"We hope Australia will have a right understanding of this and stop the groundless suspicion and speculations," Guo added.
This is not the first time certain Australian politicians has leveled baseless accusations of China intending to sabotage its undersea cables. Back in May, Defense Minister Richard Marles claimed during the Shangri-La Dialogue that China ought to boost transparency around its maritime operations. He also asserted that a surge in damage to subsea cables had transformed the seabed into a "battlefield," per The Australian.
Chen said Australian side's scaremongering is tied to its predictive threat‑perception framework forged in recent years. This framework designates China and other countries as strategic competitors in advance, subsequently forces routine scientific activities into a confrontational framework, Chen said.
Apart from unfounded allegations against China, the paper claims Australia's defense military "must incorporate the defense of submarine cable infrastructure into its operational planning," according to The Australian.
It added the government should also consider up¬grading an auxiliary ship operated by the navy, ADV Guidance, to enable it to repair damaged cables.
The vast majority of submarine cable damages are caused by accidental factors such as fishing operations and vessel anchoring, rather than deliberate sabotage. For suspected cases of intentional damage, independent technical investigation bodies should be established, and the principle of "investigate first, characterize later" should be strictly applied, so as to prevent ordinary maritime accidents from escalating into diplomatic conflicts, Chen said.
The core problem of Australian side's submarine cable security lies entirely with itself. Instead of addressing its own infrastructure shortcomings and improving its domestic protection and maintenance systems, the Australian side has chosen to continually exaggerate external threats and stoke bloc confrontation, the expert added.
Chen said that by fabricating alleged Chinese threats, Australian side seeks to "rationalize" its military spending increases and underwater force expansion. The submarine digital infrastructure originally meant to serve global development has been labeled along us versus them lines, and this constitutes the biggest hidden danger, he added.
。 8月20日，在《黑神话：悟空》发售两周年、《黑神话：钟馗》官宣一周年的节点，《黑神话》系列美术总监杨奇发布了一条长微博。最新实机视频：原文摘录如下：PV视频刚刚上传完毕，稍微有点戒断反应，今晚怕是没心思工作了。听说发长文显得人比较忠厚，这次争取写长一点，聊点正经事儿...又是一个820，其实每年这天都挺怕的，怕被盯着交东西。今年更怕，因为确实有点东西... 讲真的，820变成固定节目绝非出于本意，不过好处嘛，倒也是有的：同事们居然花了两个月，把原计划小半年的工作量给收尾了(掐指一算要见用户，这帮人立情绪失控，肢体异变，拦都拦不住...再多想一层，谁说掏上个百来块钱，只能买到一串冷冰冰的CDKey？游戏出来之前照样可以提供情绪价值，逢年过节，翻个跟头助助兴，聚一聚，闹一闹，怎么就不算一种免费玩法呢？！话说回来，黑猴也凉了挺久了，好像质疑声还是不少：悟空上了，不做续集，做什么钟馗？希望有了这部PV，多少能作出一些解答。

简单归纳，以前那些小花招，障眼法不管用了，如果要再碰西游题材，我们得换个地方，先把基本功练扎实。随便列举几条，老师们可在短片里稍作对照（目前都还在摸索，看个苗头就好）：1，这次要争取把阴天做到位。阴天是最有带入感的叙事氛围，但碍于全局光照明的一些渲染痛点，很难表达好物体的真实体感，画面容易偏平，色彩分布也会失真。所以黑猴里喜欢用大太阳来遮掩问题，就算表现一些压抑的环境氛围，也只能把主光源调成夕阳或者冷色，目的还是先让对比度刺激起来，分散注意力。这种方法固然好用，但终归降低了画面的可信度，也带来一些自动曝光的屁股没擦干净。2，可信的战斗交互和反馈。对，还是“可信”，越是神魔题材，可信度越重要。说起来挺粗暴的，目前的开发手段就是狂堆基础动作数据，衔接动作帧尽量覆盖，运镜保持克制，避免摆拍感。这些玩意对设计和耐心都是考验，内部的动画老师们最近每天偷偷跑去动捕棚加场，一点成本意识都没有，捕回来的很多数据直到这个PV封版都没K完...3，本本分分的设计风格，不做单纯讨好眼睛的创意。学生时代听到耳朵起茧的 “渐老渐熟，乃造平淡”，放在设计上，也是基本功。我们以前跑偏了很久，黑猴在往回跑了，只是还不够。